↓ Skip to main content

Grounding the Meanings in Sensorimotor Behavior using Reinforcement Learning

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurorobotics, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Grounding the Meanings in Sensorimotor Behavior using Reinforcement Learning
Published in
Frontiers in Neurorobotics, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnbot.2012.00001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Igor Farkaš, Tomáš Malík, Kristína Rebrová, Farkaš, Igor, Malík, Tomáš, Rebrová, Kristína

Abstract

The recent outburst of interest in cognitive developmental robotics is fueled by the ambition to propose ecologically plausible mechanisms of how, among other things, a learning agent/robot could ground linguistic meanings in its sensorimotor behavior. Along this stream, we propose a model that allows the simulated iCub robot to learn the meanings of actions (point, touch, and push) oriented toward objects in robot's peripersonal space. In our experiments, the iCub learns to execute motor actions and comment on them. Architecturally, the model is composed of three neural-network-based modules that are trained in different ways. The first module, a two-layer perceptron, is trained by back-propagation to attend to the target position in the visual scene, given the low-level visual information and the feature-based target information. The second module, having the form of an actor-critic architecture, is the most distinguishing part of our model, and is trained by a continuous version of reinforcement learning to execute actions as sequences, based on a linguistic command. The third module, an echo-state network, is trained to provide the linguistic description of the executed actions. The trained model generalizes well in case of novel action-target combinations with randomized initial arm positions. It can also promptly adapt its behavior if the action/target suddenly changes during motor execution.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 7%
France 2 5%
Germany 2 5%
Slovakia 2 5%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 33 77%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Student > Master 7 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 15 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 16%
Psychology 6 14%
Engineering 5 12%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 5 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2014.
All research outputs
#13,385,332
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurorobotics
#263
of 846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,748
of 244,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurorobotics
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 846 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.