↓ Skip to main content

Determining the Efficacy of Surgical Versus Non-Surgical Management in T3M0 Laryngeal Cancer With Cord Fixation

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determining the Efficacy of Surgical Versus Non-Surgical Management in T3M0 Laryngeal Cancer With Cord Fixation
Published in
Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, July 2023
DOI 10.1177/00034894231187478
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henry C. Ideker, Ronald J. Walker, Angela Mazul, Sean T. Massa

Abstract

Survival of laryngeal cancer is decreasing; thus, optimal treatment selection is paramount. Specifically, T3 disease survival appears similar with surgical or non-surgical management; however, the implications of vocal cord fixation on treatment selection and survival are unknown. This study seeks to determine if surgical treatment of patients with T3M0 laryngeal cancer with vocal cord fixation is associated with superior survival compared to non-surgical treatment. The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for all T3M0 laryngeal carcinoma cases from 2004 to 2015, whose treatment included surgery or radiation therapy. Cases were stratified by cord fixation status and overall survival was compared using multivariable methods based on surgical versus non-surgical management. Non-surgical management was more common, regardless of cord fixation status (84% in fixed and 79% in mobile). Cord fixation itself did not influence survival; however, surgical management had a significant survival benefit in the fixed cohort (HR = 0.843; 95% CI: 0.738, 0.962). In this large observational cohort study of T3M0 laryngeal cancer, those with fixed cords had superior survival when managed surgically.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2023.
All research outputs
#8,509,253
of 26,180,352 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology
#295
of 1,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,726
of 369,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,352 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,918 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.