The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Combination of Urine Exosomal mRNAs and lncRNAs as Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers for Bladder Cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, April 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2021.667212 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Haiming Huang, Jialin Du, Bo Jin, Lu Pang, Nan Duan, Chenwei Huang, Jiayin Hou, Wei Yu, Han Hao, Haixia Li |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 15% |
Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 14 | 54% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 16 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2023.
All research outputs
#8,855,792
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#3,509
of 22,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,627
of 458,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#183
of 1,238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,913 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.