The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical Value of Fecal Calprotectin in Predicting Mucosal Healing in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, August 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.679264 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Fang Chen, Yue Hu, Yi-Hong Fan, Bin Lv |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 20% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 20% |
Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 24% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 8% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2023.
All research outputs
#8,043,085
of 24,176,645 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,996
of 6,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,372
of 421,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#138
of 410 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,176,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 410 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.