The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A modified perioperative regimen for deceased donor kidney transplantation in presensitized recipients without prior desensitization therapy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, July 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1223567 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zhiliang Guo, Daqiang Zhao, Rula Sa, Lu Wang, Songxia Li, Guangyuan Zhao, Lan Zhu, Gang Chen |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2023.
All research outputs
#5,042,943
of 26,180,352 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#5,629
of 32,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,408
of 375,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#137
of 1,222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,352 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.