The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
How effective are perches in promoting bird-mediated seed dispersal for natural forest regeneration? A systematic review protocol
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Evidence, August 2023
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13750-023-00308-z |
Authors |
Jelaine Lim Gan, Matthew James Grainger, Mark David Foster Shirley, Marion Pfeifer |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Philippines | 1 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 19 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 55% |
Scientists | 9 | 41% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 13% |
Researcher | 3 | 13% |
Librarian | 2 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 22% |
Unknown | 5 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 26% |
Unspecified | 3 | 13% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 13% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,668,299
of 26,542,140 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#50
of 325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,577
of 370,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,542,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them