The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prognostic Impact of Hyperpolypharmacy Due to Noncardiovascular Medications in Patients After Acute Decompensated Heart Failure ― Insights From the Clue of Risk Stratification in the Elderly Patients With Heart Failure (CURE-HF) Registry ―
|
---|---|
Published in |
Circulation Journal, August 2023
|
DOI | 10.1253/circj.cj-22-0712 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Masafumi Kanai, Masatoshi Minamisawa, Hirohiko Motoki, Yuta Seko, Kazuhiro Kimura, Takahiro Okano, Yasushi Ueki, Koji Yoshie, Tamon Kato, Tatsuya Saigusa, Soichiro Ebisawa, Ayako Okada, Neiko Ozasa, Takao Kato, Koichiro Kuwahara |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2023.
All research outputs
#19,962,154
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#1,641
of 2,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,896
of 358,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#47
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.