The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Howell-Jolly Body-Like Inclusions in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Possible Novel Findings
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Blood Medicine, March 2023
|
DOI | 10.2147/jbm.s399596 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amaylia Oehadian, Ian Huang, Andini Kartikasari, Bachti Alisjahbana, Delita Prihatni |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
Researcher | 1 | 25% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,312,374
of 25,501,527 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Blood Medicine
#113
of 334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,618
of 423,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Blood Medicine
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,501,527 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.