The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Galantamine ameliorates hyperoxia-induced brain injury in neonatal mice
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, June 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2023.890015 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nahla Zaghloul, Naomi S. Cohen, Kamesh R. Ayasolla, Hsiu-Ling Li, Dalibor Kurepa, Mohamed N. Ahmed |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 1 | 33% |
Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2021.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#8,086
of 11,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,823
of 377,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#219
of 387 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 387 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.