The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 168 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Aetiology of Type 2 diabetes in people with a ‘normal’ body mass index: testing the personal fat threshold hypothesis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Science, August 2023
|
DOI | 10.1042/cs20230586 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Roy Taylor, Alison C. Barnes, Kieren G. Hollingsworth, Keaton M. Irvine, Alexandra S. Solovyova, Lucy Clark, Tara Kelly, Carmen Martin-Ruiz, Davide Romeres, Albert Koulman, Claire M. Meek, Benjamin Jenkins, Claudio Cobelli, Rury R. Holman |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 8 | 5% |
Canada | 3 | 2% |
India | 2 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Poland | 1 | <1% |
Thailand | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 139 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 109 | 65% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 41 | 24% |
Scientists | 16 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
Researcher | 2 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 23 | 56% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 22% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 22 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 98. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2024.
All research outputs
#465,646
of 26,411,386 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Science
#21
of 2,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,861
of 366,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Science
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,411,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.