↓ Skip to main content

Transcriptional Analysis of Acinetobacter sp. neg1 Capable of Degrading Ochratoxin A

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transcriptional Analysis of Acinetobacter sp. neg1 Capable of Degrading Ochratoxin A
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02162
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vania C. Liuzzi, Francesca Fanelli, Mariana Tristezza, Miriam Haidukowski, Ernesto Picardi, Caterina Manzari, Claudia Lionetti, Francesco Grieco, Antonio F. Logrieco, Michael R. Thon, Graziano Pesole, Giuseppina Mulè

Abstract

Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a nephrotoxic and potentially carcinogenic mycotoxin produced by several species of Aspergillus and Penicillium, contaminating grapes, wine and a variety of food products. We recently isolated from OTA contaminated soil vineyard a novel free-living strain of Acinetobacter sp. neg1, ITEM 17016, able to degrade OTA into the non-toxic catabolic product ochratoxin α. Biochemical studies suggested that the degradation reaction proceeds via peptide bond hydrolysis with phenylalanine (Phe) release. In order to identify genes responsible for OTA degradation we performed a differential gene expression analysis of ITEM 17016 grown in the presence or absence of the toxin. Among the differentially expressed genes, six peptidases up-regulated at 6 h were identified. The degrading activity of the carboxypeptidase PJ_1540 was confirmed in vitro in a heterologous system. The enrichment analysis for Gene Ontology terms confirmed that OTA degradation proceeds through peptidase activities and revealed the over-representation of pathways related to Phe catabolism. These results indicate that Phe may represent an energy source for this Acinetobacter sp. neg1 strain and that OTA degrading reaction triggers the modulation of further catabolic activities.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 15 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 15%
Chemistry 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 19 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2017.
All research outputs
#20,235,780
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#19,705
of 29,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#307,997
of 424,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#316
of 393 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 393 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.