The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Abnormal lens thickening in a child with Weill–Marchesani syndrome 4: A 3-year follow-up case report
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, January 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2022.1021489 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Junting Huang, Kailai Nie, Xinpin Lv, Yuting Liu, Guiqi Yang, Junjiang Fu, Longqian Liu, Hongbin Lv |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,828,625
of 24,317,326 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,204
of 6,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,123
of 447,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#62
of 422 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,317,326 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 422 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.