The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Perceived Impact of Iron Deficiency and Iron Therapy Preference in Exercising Females of Reproductive Age: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, August 2023
|
DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s397122 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cory Dugan, Aaron Simpson, Peter Peeling, Jayne Lim, Amelia Davies, Paige Buissink, Beth MacLean, Pradeep Jayasuriya, Toby Richards |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 25% |
Australia | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 18% |
Lecturer | 2 | 18% |
Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 9% |
Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2024.
All research outputs
#14,812,100
of 26,213,251 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#721
of 1,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,037
of 366,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#8
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,213,251 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,778 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.