The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Functional analysis of a novel nonsense variant c.91A>T of the TRAPPC2 gene in a Chinese family with X-linked recessive autosomal spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia tarda
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, August 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2023.1216592 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Guiyu Lou, Yuanyin Zhao, Huiru Zhao, Yuwei Zhang, Bingtao Hao, Litao Qin, Hongyan Liu, Shixiu Liao |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2023.
All research outputs
#16,851,806
of 26,530,858 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#4,636
of 14,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,143
of 365,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#81
of 331 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,530,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,011 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 331 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.