↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of action of therapeutic exercise for knee and hip OA remain a black box phenomenon: an individual patient data mediation study with the OA Trial Bank

Overview of attention for article published in RMD Open, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
75 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanisms of action of therapeutic exercise for knee and hip OA remain a black box phenomenon: an individual patient data mediation study with the OA Trial Bank
Published in
RMD Open, August 2023
DOI 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003220
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jos Runhaar, Melanie A Holden, Miriam Hattle, Jonathan Quicke, Emma Louise Healey, Danielle van der Windt, Krysia S Dziedzic, Marienke van Middelkoop, Sita Bierma-Zeinstra, Nadine E Foster, The STEER OA Patient Advisory Group, Jenny Brown, Carol Ingram, Sheila Hickson, Robert Taylor, Christine Walker, The OA Trial Bank Exercise Collaborative, J Haxby Abbott, Kelli Allen, Michael Hurley, Kim Bennell, David Bossen, Kanda Chaipinyo, Tom Cochrane, Mariëtte de Rooij, May Arna Risberg, Kelley Fitzgerald, Helen French, Leigh Hale, Marius Henriksen, Rana S Hinman, Marijke Hopman-Rock, Justin Keogh, Cindy Veenhof, Jesper Knoop, Inga Krauß, Pazit Levinger, Christopher McCarthy, Stephen P Messier, Ari Heinonen, Havard Osteras, Shahnawaz Anwer, AnaCristina Rodrigues Lacerda, Ganesh Shankar, Benjamin Steinhilber, Yusuke Suzuki, Michael A Hunt, Laura Talbot, Carolien Teirlinck, Michael Doherty, Pao-Feng Tsai, Jason Wallis, Merve Yilmaz Menek

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 12%
Researcher 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 7 28%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 36%
Sports and Recreations 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 6 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2024.
All research outputs
#1,059,396
of 26,784,510 outputs
Outputs from RMD Open
#67
of 1,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,236
of 367,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from RMD Open
#5
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,784,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.