↓ Skip to main content

Structured decision making remains underused in ecological restoration despite opportunities

Overview of attention for article published in Environment Systems and Decisions, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structured decision making remains underused in ecological restoration despite opportunities
Published in
Environment Systems and Decisions, September 2023
DOI 10.1007/s10669-023-09940-z
Authors

Morgan L. Piczak, Jessica A. Robichaud, Peter Morrison, Andrew M. Rous, Ingeborg M. Mulder, Cassandra J. Hill, Tanya S. Prystay, Hanna Rosner-Katz, Kelly F. Robinson, Joseph R. Bennett, Steven J. Cooke

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 29%
Researcher 3 21%
Other 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,749,260
of 26,582,041 outputs
Outputs from Environment Systems and Decisions
#132
of 360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,830
of 365,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environment Systems and Decisions
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,582,041 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.