The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Thalamic Bursts and the Epic Pain Model
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.3389/fncom.2016.00147 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carl Y. Saab, Lisa Feldman Barrett |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
Spain | 1 | 25% |
Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 20% |
Researcher | 11 | 20% |
Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 15 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 11 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 7% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Psychology | 3 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 19 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2018.
All research outputs
#16,294,872
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#746
of 1,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,449
of 425,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#13
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.