↓ Skip to main content

The Effect of Number and Presentation Order of High-Constraint Sentences on Second Language Word Learning

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Effect of Number and Presentation Order of High-Constraint Sentences on Second Language Word Learning
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01396
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tengfei Ma, Ran Chen, Susan Dunlap, Baoguo Chen

Abstract

This paper presents the results of an experiment that investigated the effects of number and presentation order of high-constraint sentences on semantic processing of unknown second language (L2) words (pseudowords) through reading. All participants were Chinese native speakers who learned English as a foreign language. In the experiment, sentence constraint and order of different constraint sentences were manipulated in English sentences, as well as L2 proficiency level of participants. We found that the number of high-constraint sentences was supportive for L2 word learning except in the condition in which high-constraint exposure was presented first. Moreover, when the number of high-constraint sentences was the same, learning was significantly better when the first exposure was a high-constraint exposure. And no proficiency level effects were found. Our results provided direct evidence that L2 word learning benefited from high quality language input and first presentations of high quality language input.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Master 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 22%
Linguistics 2 11%
Neuroscience 2 11%
Social Sciences 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2017.
All research outputs
#15,423,393
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#18,827
of 30,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,101
of 321,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#310
of 426 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 426 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.