The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Identifying and Validating Potential Biomarkers of Early Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma Diagnosis and Prognosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, April 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2021.644426 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yingji Chen, Longyu Jin, Zhibin Jiang, Suo Liu, Wei Feng |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 2 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
Researcher | 1 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 11% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 44% |
Design | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2023.
All research outputs
#4,547,452
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#1,542
of 22,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,547
of 443,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#97
of 1,226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,913 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.