↓ Skip to main content

Early palliative care versus usual haematological care in multiple myeloma: retrospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care , September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early palliative care versus usual haematological care in multiple myeloma: retrospective cohort study
Published in
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care , September 2023
DOI 10.1136/spcare-2023-004524
Pubmed ID
Authors

Davide Giusti, Elisabetta Colaci, Valeria Pioli, Federico Banchelli, Monica Maccaferri, Giovanna Leonardi, Roberto Marasca, Monica Morselli, Fabio Forghieri, Francesca Bettelli, Angela Cuoghi, Paola Bresciani, Andrea Messerotti, Andrea Gilioli, Anna Candoni, Luca Cassanelli, Elena Sbadili, Ilaria Bassoli, Giuseppe Longo, Fabio Gilioli, Eleonora Borelli, Sarah Bigi, Roberto D'Amico, Carlo Adolfo Porro, Oreofe Odejide, Camilla Zimmermann, Fabio Efficace, Eduardo Bruera, Mario Luppi, Elena Bandieri, Leonardo Potenza

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 21%
Librarian 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Unknown 7 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Chemistry 1 7%
Sports and Recreations 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,773,713
of 26,251,549 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
#189
of 1,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,807
of 368,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
#4
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,251,549 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,918 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.