The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Neuroprotective effects of crude extracts, compounds, and isolated molecules obtained from plants in the central nervous system injuries: a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2023.1249685 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maria Vitoria Nava Moura, Gabriel Mesquita da Conceição Bahia, Marcio Gonçalves Correa, Maíza Amanda Araujo Sarges, Thaís Alves Lobão, Erica Miranda Sanches, Karen R. H. Matos Oliveira, Anderson Manoel Herculano, Carlomagno Pacheco Bahia |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 18% |
Lecturer | 2 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 9% |
Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2023.
All research outputs
#15,897,129
of 26,588,548 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#6,519
of 11,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,693
of 364,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#110
of 315 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,588,548 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 315 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.