Title |
Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science, October 2023
|
DOI | 10.1126/science.adh5007 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jeffrey S Pigati, Kathleen B Springer, Jeffrey S Honke, David Wahl, Marie R Champagne, Susan R H Zimmerman, Harrison J Gray, Vincent L Santucci, Daniel Odess, David Bustos, Matthew R Bennett |
Abstract |
Human footprints at White Sands National Park, New Mexico, USA, reportedly date to between ~23,000 and 21,000 years ago according to radiocarbon dating of seeds from the aquatic plant Ruppia cirrhosa. These ages remain controversial because of potential old carbon reservoir effects that could compromise their accuracy. We present new calibrated 14C ages of terrestrial pollen collected from the same stratigraphic horizons as those of the Ruppia seeds, along with optically stimulated luminescence ages of sediments from within the human footprint-bearing sequence, to evaluate the veracity of the seed ages. The results show that the chronologic framework originally established for the White Sands footprints is robust and reaffirm that humans were present in North America during the Last Glacial Maximum. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 25 | 8% |
Canada | 5 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
India | 4 | 1% |
France | 3 | <1% |
Greece | 2 | <1% |
Norway | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Mexico | 2 | <1% |
Other | 23 | 7% |
Unknown | 250 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 267 | 83% |
Scientists | 42 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 2% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 25% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Professor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 8% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 16 | 40% |