↓ Skip to main content

真性赤血球増加症および本態性血小板血症におけるスクリーニング検査とJAK2-V617F変異予測についての検討

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Medical Technology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
真性赤血球増加症および本態性血小板血症におけるスクリーニング検査とJAK2-V617F変異予測についての検討
Published in
Japanese Journal of Medical Technology, January 2017
DOI 10.14932/jamt.16-14
Authors

河野 浩善, 三好 夏季, 竹野 由美子, 山本 真代, 沖川 佳子, 野田 昌昭, 兼丸 恵子, 飯伏 義弘

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2017.
All research outputs
#23,195,360
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Medical Technology
#116
of 121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#367,151
of 425,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Medical Technology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.