The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bladder training for treating overactive bladder in adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2023
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013571.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Satoshi Funada, Takashi Yoshioka, Yan Luo, Akira Sato, Shusuke Akamatsu, Norio Watanabe |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 20% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
United States | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 9% |
Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 29 | 64% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
Decision Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 27 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,498,959
of 26,798,288 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,777
of 13,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,228
of 372,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,798,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.