Restricted versus Usual/Liberal Maintenance Fluid Strategy in Mechanically Ventilated Children: An Open-Label Randomized Trial (ReLiSCh Trial)

Overview of attention for article published in Indian Journal of Pediatrics, October 2023

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 1,741)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

So far, Altmetric has seen 19 X posts from 19 X users, with an upper bound of 29,607 followers.

インドの単施設からの報告、RCT. 人工呼吸器患者における輸液制限群（維持輸液量の40％） vs 通常輸液群（維持輸液量の70-80%）。輸液制限群の方がFOの割合が低く、死亡率が低いという結果。 https://t.co/ucbUFvwM2U

RT @mardi_steere: Hemodynamically stable ventilated kids randomized to 40% (restricted) or 70-80% (usual/liberal) MIVF Restricted: ✅more v…

RT @Qalb2Abbas: Another very relevant and useful study on maintenance fluids in #Children admitted in #PedsICU showing less is more.

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 15 additional X posts.