The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of Patient Subgroups on the Efficacy and Safety of Methylnaltrexone for Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients with Advanced Illness
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, October 2023
|
DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s416307 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Neel Mehta, Neal E Slatkin, Robert J Israel, Nancy Stambler, Eric D Shah |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,408,168
of 24,840,108 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#289
of 1,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,330
of 326,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,840,108 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.