The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Magnetic resonance imaging arterial spin labeling hypoperfusion with diffusion-weighted image hyperintensity is useful for diagnostic imaging of Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, October 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2023.1242615 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yuki Kitazaki, Masamichi Ikawa, Tadanori Hamano, Hirohito Sasaki, Tomohisa Yamaguchi, Soichi Enomoto, Norimichi Shirafuji, Kouji Hayashi, Osamu Yamamura, Tetsuya Tsujikawa, Hidehiko Okazawa, Hirohiko Kimura, Yasunari Nakamoto |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,671,258
of 24,751,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#3,748
of 13,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,385
of 255,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#28
of 442 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,751,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 442 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.