The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Quilting after mastectomy significantly reduces seroma formation
|
---|---|
Published in |
South African Journal of Surgery, September 2015
|
DOI | 10.7196/sajsnew.7864 |
Authors |
Gurdeep Singh Mannu, Khalid Qurihi, Frank Carey, Mohammad Ady Ahmad, Maged Hussien |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 44% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2022.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from South African Journal of Surgery
#10
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,264
of 286,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from South African Journal of Surgery
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them