↓ Skip to main content

曳索鉄道による鉱石運搬の合理化

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Mining and Metallurgical Institute of Japan, January 1958
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
曳索鉄道による鉱石運搬の合理化
Published in
Journal of the Mining and Metallurgical Institute of Japan, January 1958
DOI 10.2473/shigentosozai1953.74.842_461
Authors

山田 胖

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2023.
All research outputs
#16,864,638
of 24,796,076 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Mining and Metallurgical Institute of Japan
#63
of 81 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,530
of 6,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Mining and Metallurgical Institute of Japan
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,796,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 81 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them