The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Following in Banting’s footsteps or straying from the path? Observations from contemporary diabetes innovation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in endocrinology, November 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fendo.2023.1270517 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Connor Leadley, Ananta Addala, Juliet Berkeley, Hamish Crocket, Elizabeth A. Davis, Niranjala Hewapathirana, Sufyan Hussain, Rayhan Lal, Kate Lomax, Thomas Wilkinson, Martin de Bock, Marie-Anne Burckhardt |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 2 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
Unknown | 8 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,848,081
of 26,180,352 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#1,497
of 13,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,449
of 361,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#31
of 700 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,352 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 700 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.