The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of high-dose intravenous vitamin C therapy on the prognosis in patients with moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis: protocol of a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, November 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2023.1278167 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wenwu Sun, Bing Zhao, Jiaoyan Li, Yihui Wang, Xing Qi, Ning Ning, Silei Sun, Mengjiao Li, Yi Yao, Tongtian Ni, Li Ma, Juan He, Jun Huang, Zhitao Yang, Ying Chen, Huiqiu Sheng, Enqiang Mao |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#20,181,215
of 24,807,923 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#4,792
of 6,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,083
of 191,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#49
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,807,923 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.