The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Social drug dealing: how peer-to-peer fintech platforms have transformed illicit drug markets
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Operations Research, October 2023
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10479-023-05617-7 |
Authors |
Jörn Boehnke, Pantelis Loupos, Ying Gu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
Professor | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 22 | 61% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 14% |
Computer Science | 3 | 8% |
Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 24 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#702,685
of 24,853,509 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Operations Research
#5
of 818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,435
of 255,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Operations Research
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,853,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 818 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.