↓ Skip to main content

小児病院前救護における静脈路確保と薬剤投与の施行体制の現況

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
小児病院前救護における静脈路確保と薬剤投与の施行体制の現況
Published in
Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine, February 2016
DOI 10.11240/jsem.19.35
Authors

クナウプ 絵美里, 賀来 典之, 野坂 宜之, 塚原 紘平, 榎本 有希, 六車 崇

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2023.
All research outputs
#21,145,071
of 25,971,360 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine
#124
of 193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,377
of 313,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,971,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.