RT @IczkowskiA: We weigh in https://t.co/Ow3Dc3AmJS on the 3+3 prostate cancer controversy.
2,454 followers
1,704 followers
@uroegg @ChapinMD @alison_tree @DrAndrewLoblaw @VickersBiostats @Tilki_De Some pathologists seem to have a problem with this 🤔 https://t.co/RD2TM6ck5r
616 followers
another well laid argument to not change the GG1 designation as benign-Gleason score 3+3=6 prostatic adenocarcinoma is not benign and the current debate is unhelpful to clinicians and pa… https://t.co/SZO6bMyw1K
12,791 followers
RT @smlungpathguy: Pathologists must push back when a clinical paradigm is incorrect or misguided. If we do not, we will end up with an inc…