The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Technology assessment and cost-effectiveness analysis in health care: the adoption of technologies and the development of clinical guidelines for the Brazilian national system
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, June 2007
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1413-81232003000200014 |
Authors |
Letícia Krauss Silva |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 3 | 2% |
Unknown | 137 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 33 | 24% |
Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
Researcher | 13 | 9% |
Other | 24 | 17% |
Unknown | 22 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 31% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Other | 34 | 24% |
Unknown | 29 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2020.
All research outputs
#8,880,831
of 26,220,821 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#740
of 2,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,146
of 79,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#21
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,220,821 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,088 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.