↓ Skip to main content

日本の土壌中のカドミウム濃度

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
日本の土壌中のカドミウム濃度
Published in
Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, June 2017
DOI 10.20710/dojo.80.1_30
Authors

山崎 慎一, 木村 和彦, 本吉 博美, 武田 晃, 南條 正巳

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2023.
All research outputs
#16,921,538
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
#63
of 94 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,014
of 329,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
#16
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.