The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
How should we decide how to treat the child: harm versus best interests in cases of disagreement
|
---|---|
Published in |
Medical Law Review, December 2023
|
DOI | 10.1093/medlaw/fwad040 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David Archard, Emma Cave, Joe Brierley |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 15 | 45% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 17 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 48% |
Scientists | 11 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 20% |
Psychology | 1 | 20% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,826,053
of 26,445,299 outputs
Outputs from Medical Law Review
#40
of 443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,053
of 389,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Law Review
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,445,299 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them