↓ Skip to main content

Construct validity evidence reporting practices for the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test: A systematic scoping review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Psychology Review, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
296 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Construct validity evidence reporting practices for the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test: A systematic scoping review
Published in
Clinical Psychology Review, December 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102378
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wendy C Higgins, David M Kaplan, Eliane Deschrijver, Robert M Ross

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 296 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 15%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 12 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 27%
Unspecified 3 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 12 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 191. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2024.
All research outputs
#224,198
of 26,628,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Psychology Review
#56
of 1,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,588
of 391,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Psychology Review
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,628,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.