The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Defining genetic diversity of rhesus macaque Fcγ receptors with long-read RNA sequencing
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1306292 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Haleigh E. Conley, Max M. He, David Easterhoff, Hélène Fradin Kirshner, Sarah L. Cocklin, Jacob Meyer, Taylor Hoxie, Madison Berry, Todd Bradley, William D. Tolbert, Marzena Pazgier, Georgia D. Tomaras, Joern E. Schmitz, Michael Anthony Moody, Kevin Wiehe, Justin Pollara |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
Mexico | 1 | 25% |
Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2024.
All research outputs
#16,685,214
of 26,281,700 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#17,402
of 32,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,686
of 377,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#398
of 1,053 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,281,700 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,053 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.