The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dual isolation of primary neurons and oligodendrocytes from guinea pig frontal cortex
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fncel.2023.1298685 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Roisin A. Moloney, Carlton L. Pavy, Richard G. S. Kahl, Hannah K. Palliser, Jon J. Hirst, Julia C. Shaw |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 3 | 50% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Scientists | 3 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,625,141
of 25,151,710 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#1,201
of 4,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,005
of 172,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#7
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,151,710 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.