The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 113 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mapping the planet’s critical areas for biodiversity and nature’s contributions to people
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-023-43832-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel A. Neugarten, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer, Richard P. Sharp, Richard Schuster, Matthew Strimas-Mackey, Patrick R. Roehrdanz, Mark Mulligan, Arnout van Soesbergen, David Hole, Christina M. Kennedy, James R. Oakleaf, Justin A. Johnson, Joseph Kiesecker, Stephen Polasky, Jeffrey O. Hanson, Amanda D. Rodewald |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Bhutan | 2 | 2% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 92 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 87 | 77% |
| Scientists | 18 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 40 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 24 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 14% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 5% |
| Engineering | 6 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 44 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 214. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#194,173
of 26,557,909 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#2,779
of 62,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,059
of 388,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#85
of 2,349 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,909 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 62,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,349 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.