The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
National-scale remotely sensed lake trophic state from 1984 through 2020
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Data, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41597-024-02921-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michael F. Meyer, Simon N. Topp, Tyler V. King, Robert Ladwig, Rachel M. Pilla, Hilary A. Dugan, Jack R. Eggleston, Stephanie E. Hampton, Dina M. Leech, Isabella A. Oleksy, Jesse C. Ross, Matthew R. V. Ross, R. Iestyn Woolway, Xiao Yang, Matthew R. Brousil, Kate C. Fickas, Julie C. Padowski, Amina I. Pollard, Jianning Ren, Jacob A. Zwart |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 21 | 30% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
Germany | 2 | 3% |
Spain | 2 | 3% |
Canada | 2 | 3% |
Sweden | 1 | 1% |
Ireland | 1 | 1% |
Malawi | 1 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 30 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 37 | 54% |
Scientists | 31 | 45% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 21% |
Researcher | 5 | 18% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 9 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 5 | 18% |
Engineering | 4 | 14% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#800,026
of 26,449,643 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Data
#313
of 3,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,507
of 381,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Data
#14
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,449,643 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.