The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Quantifying effectiveness and best practices for bumblebee identification from photographs
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Reports, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41598-023-41548-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
A. M. Colgan, R. G. Hatfield, A. Dolan, W. Velman, R. E. Newton, T. A. Graves |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 25% |
Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 38% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 38% |
Engineering | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,391,613
of 25,320,147 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#43,727
of 139,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,486
of 260,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#545
of 2,594 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,320,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 139,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,594 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.