↓ Skip to main content

Oral ingestion of Shiikuwasha extract suppresses diabetes progression in db/db mice by preserving β-cell mass

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oral ingestion of Shiikuwasha extract suppresses diabetes progression in db/db mice by preserving β-cell mass
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2023.1336133
Pubmed ID
Authors

Megumi Kaji, Yukiko K. Kaneko, Stella Amarachi Ihim, Ran Kanoh, Moe Yamamoto, Momoka Yamaguchi, Tomohisa Ishikawa

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#20,515,349
of 25,211,948 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#4,167
of 6,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,709
of 222,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#111
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,211,948 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,598 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.