The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Rational design of antibodies and development of a novel method for (1–3)-β-D glucan detection as an alternative to Limulus amebocyte lysate assay
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1322264 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chunlong Liu, Lin Zhang, Jiaxing Zhang, Mengfan Wang, Shengping You, Rongxin Su, Wei Qi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#21,504,983
of 26,383,000 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#5,687
of 8,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,560
of 379,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#182
of 342 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,383,000 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 342 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.