The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparing the effects of augmented virtual reality treadmill training versus conventional treadmill training in patients with stage II-III Parkinson’s disease: the VIRTREAD-PD randomized controlled trial protocol
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2024.1338609 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gemma Lombardi, Marco Baccini, Alice Gualerzi, Silvia Pancani, Silvia Campagnini, Stefano Doronzio, Diego Longo, Alessandro Maselli, Giulio Cherubini, Michele Piazzini, Tommaso Ciapetti, Cristina Polito, Samuele Pinna, Chiara De Santis, Marzia Bedoni, Claudio Macchi, Silvia Ramat, Francesca Cecchi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 17 | 77% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 5% |
Design | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 16 | 73% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2024.
All research outputs
#20,632,505
of 25,352,304 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#9,175
of 14,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,434
of 214,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#162
of 388 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,352,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 388 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.