The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The relationship between education attainment and gout, and the mediating role of modifiable risk factors: a Mendelian randomization study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1269426 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xin Huang, Xin Chen, Qixi Liu, Zhiwei Zhang, Juan Miao, Yuchan Lai, Jinqing Wu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,784,237
of 25,235,161 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,110
of 13,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,820
of 224,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#27
of 501 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,235,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 501 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.