The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Corrigendum: A national cross-sectional study on the influencing factors of low HPV vaccination coverage in mainland China
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, December 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1328661 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xiangju Yin, Mengrui Zhang, Fei Wang, Yue Huang, Yuyao Niu, Pu Ge, Wenli Yu, Yibo Wu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 50% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#22,635,669
of 25,249,294 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#9,632
of 13,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,532
of 324,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#335
of 770 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,249,294 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 770 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.