The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Sources of bias in applying close‐kin mark–recapture to terrestrial game species with different life histories
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecology, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.1002/ecy.4244 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anthony Sévêque, Robert C. Lonsinger, Lisette P. Waits, Kristin E. Brzeski, Lisa M. Komoroske, Caitlin N. Ott‐Conn, Sarah L. Mayhew, D. Cody Norton, Tyler R. Petroelje, John D. Swenson, Dana J. Morin |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 46% |
Unspecified | 2 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 31% |
Unspecified | 3 | 23% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 8% |
Mathematics | 1 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#15,925,930
of 26,505,350 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#5,671
of 7,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,126
of 383,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#48
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,505,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.