The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The debate rages on: physician-assisted suicide in an ethical light
|
---|---|
Published in |
BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.bja.2024.01.002 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
John Shenouda, Michael Blaber, Robert George, James Haslam |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
Unknown | 11 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 38% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 31% |
Scientists | 3 | 23% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 1 | 50% |
Student > Master | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 1 | 50% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#5,029,394
of 26,449,643 outputs
Outputs from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#2,112
of 6,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,606
of 381,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#52
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,449,643 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.